New York v. Lloyd-Douglas

Petition for certiorari denied on May 4, 2015

Linked with:

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
14-912 N.Y. N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2014

Issue: Whether certiorari should be granted to correct the New York Court of Appeals’ unprecedented expansion of Miranda v. Arizona’s automatic exclusionary rule, and the Court of Appeals' fundamental misunderstanding of this Court’s decision in Missouri v. Seibert, as requiring automatic suppression of defendant’s incriminating statement, made only after full advisement and waiver of Miranda warnings, solely because, just prior to the warnings, investigators read defendant a brief, standardized introduction -- which asked no questions and elicited no responses -- and which all parties agreed did not impair the voluntariness of the waiver or statement.

DateProceedings and Orders
Jan 26 2015Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 6, 2015)
Feb 24 2015Order extending time to file response to petition to and including April 6, 2015.
Mar 24 2015Brief of respondent Jermaine Dunbar in opposition filed.
Mar 24 2015Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Jermaine Dunbar.
Apr 8 2015DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 24, 2015.
Apr 9 2015Reply of petitioner New York filed. (Distributed)
Apr 27 2015DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 1, 2015.
May 4 2015Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.
May 4 2015Petition DENIED.
 
Share:
Term Snapshot
Awards