Editor's Note :

Editor's Note :

This week we are hosting an online symposium on NIFLA v. Becerra, in which the Supreme Court will consider whether the disclosures required by California’s Reproductive FACT Act violate the free speech clause of the First Amendment. Contributions are available at this link.

Nestle Purina PetCare Company v. Curts

Petition for certiorari denied on October 2, 2015
Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
14-1136 7th Cir. N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2015

Issue: Whether, under the All Writs Act and the Anti-Injunction Act, a district court's injunction to enjoin parallel state litigation pending final approval of a comprehensive settlement of a complex case can ever be “necessary in aid of its jurisdiction.”

DateProceedings and Orders
Mar 18 2015Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 17, 2015)
Apr 17 2015Waiver of right of respondent Connie Curts to respond filed.
May 5 2015DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 21, 2015.
May 11 2015Response Requested . (Due June 10, 2015)
Jun 10 2015Brief of respondent Connie Curts in opposition filed.
Jun 23 2015Reply of petitioners Nestle Purina PetCare Company, et al. filed.
Jun 24 2015DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 28, 2015.
Jun 29 2015Letter from counsel for petitioners Nestle Purina PetCare Company, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Oct 5 2015Petition DENIED.
Term Snapshot