Montgomery v. Kappos
Petition for certiorari denied on December 10, 2012| Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12-182 | Fed. Cir. | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | OT 2012 |
Issue: Whether a research proposal which was never in fact performed can, as a matter of law, inherently anticipate a patent claim under Tilghman v. Proctor.
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| Aug 6 2012 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 7, 2012) |
| Aug 29 2012 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including October 9, 2012. |
| Oct 4 2012 | Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including November 8, 2012. |
| Nov 8 2012 | Brief of respondent David J. Kappos, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director, Patent and Trademark Office in opposition filed. |
| Nov 15 2012 | Reply of petitioners Hugh E. Montgomery, et al. filed. |
| Nov 20 2012 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 7, 2012. |
| Dec 10 2012 | Petition DENIED. |





