Missouri v. Frye
Linked with:
| Docket No. | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10-444 |
Oct 31, 2011 Tr.Aud. |
TBD | TBD | TBD | OT 2011 |
Issue: Can a defendant who validly pleads guilty assert a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel by alleging that, but for counsel's error in failing to communicate a plea offer, he would have pleaded guilty with more favorable terms? What remedy, if any, should be provided for ineffective assistance of counsel during plea bargain negotiations if the defendant was later convicted and sentenced pursuant to constitutionally adequate procedures?
Plain English Issue: Can a criminal defendant who was convicted after a jury trial later argue that his lawyer was inadequate because he failed to tell him that prosecutors had offered a deal to plead guilty in exchange for a lighter sentence? And, if so, what should courts do to correct the lawyer's error?
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Argument recap: Court searches for a principled remedy
- Argument preview: Remedy for ineffective assistance of counsel during plea bargaining?
- Academic round-up
Briefs and Documents
Merits Briefs for the Petitioner Amicus Briefs in Support of the Petitioner Merits Briefs for the Respondent Amicus Briefs in Support of the Respondent- Brief of the Constitution Project
- Brief of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers Association et al.
- Brief for Center on the Administration of Criminal Law, New York University School of Law
- Brief for the American Bar Association