Minnesota v. Sago

Petition for certiorari denied on February 24, 2014
Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
13-593 Minn. N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2013

Issue: Whether Evans v. Michigan – which held that a finding of insufficient evidence precludes retrial under the Double Jeopardy Clause even if the finding is based on a legally erroneous analysis – or the cases cited in Evans, overruled Lockhart v. Nelson's holding that a post-trial finding of insufficient evidence only precludes retrial under the Double Jeopardy Clause if it is based on a face-value assessment of all the evidence admitted, not just the evidence properly admitted.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders
Nov 12 2013Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 16, 2013)
Nov 27 2013Waiver of right of respondent Esau Chucky Sago to respond filed.
Dec 11 2013DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 10, 2014.
Dec 18 2013Response Requested . (Due January 17, 2014)
Jan 16 2014Brief of respondent Esau Chucky Sago in opposition filed.
Jan 16 2014Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Esau Chucky Sago.
Jan 30 2014Reply of petitioner Minnesota filed.
Feb 5 2014DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 21, 2014.
Feb 24 2014Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.
Feb 24 2014Petition DENIED.
 
Share:
Term Snapshot
Awards