Breaking News

Marilley v. Bonham

Petition for certiorari denied on October 10, 2017
Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
16-1391 9th Cir. N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2017

Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case.

Issue: Whether the privileges and immunities clause of Article IV prohibits a State from preferentially subsidizing its own residents in the pursuit of a common calling governed by the clause, to the detriment of their nonresident competitors.

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
Mar 08 2017Application (16A881) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from March 21, 2017 to May 20, 2017, submitted to Justice Kennedy.
Mar 09 2017Application (16A881) granted by Justice Kennedy extending the time to file until May 20, 2017.
May 19 2017Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 22, 2017)
Jun 15 2017Order extending time to file response to petition to and including September 5, 2017.
Jun 22 2017Brief amicus curiae of Cato Institute filed.
Sep 05 2017Brief of respondent Charlton H. Bonham, Director of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife in opposition filed.
Sep 20 2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/6/2017.
Sep 20 2017Reply of petitioners Kevin Marilley, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Oct 10 2017Petition DENIED.