Editor's Note :

Editor's Note :

At 9:30 a.m. on Monday we expect additional orders from the Court's November 25 Conference. On Tuesday, December 2, we expect one or more opinions in argued cases; we will begin live blogging shortly before 10:00 a.m.

Magwood v. Patterson

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
09-158 11th Cir. Mar 24, 2010
Tr.
Jun 24, 2010 5-4 Thomas OT 2009

Disclosure: Akin Gump and Howe & Russell represent the petitioner in this case.

Holding: A state prisoner can often petition a federal court for a writ of habeas corpus, challenging her state court conviction or sentence. But she generally may not file a second or successive application for habeas relief. In Magwood, the defendant prevailed on habeas and had his case sent back to the state courts for a new sentencing proceeding, After the state court imposed the same sentence again, he again sought federal habeas relief. This time, he raised a new argument that could have been in his initial application but was not. The Supreme Court held that when a state prisoner obtains federal habeas relief and is re-sentenced, a habeas application challenging the new judgment is not “second or successive, even if the prisoner could have challenged the original sentence on the same ground.

Judgment: Reversed and Remanded, 5-4, in an opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas on June 24, 2010. Justice Kennedy dissented, joined by the Chief Justice and Justices Ginsburg and Alito.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Briefs and Documents

Merits Briefs

[edit] Amicus Briefs

Certiorari-stage documents

 
Share:
Term Snapshot
Awards