Editor's Note :

close editor's note Editor's Note :

The Supreme Court will release additional opinions on Tuesday at 10 a.m. We will live blog at this link, where readers can sign up for an email reminder when we start the live blog.

Breaking News :

Breaking News :

Lefemine v. Wideman

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
12-168 4th Cir. Not Argued Nov 5, 2012 TBD Per Curiam OT 2012

Holding: In a lawsuit alleging that the conduct of government officials violates the Constitution, a plaintiff who obtains a permanent injunction but no money damages is a “prevailing party” because the injunction ordered the officials to change their behavior in a way that directly benefitted the plaintiff. The plaintiff is therefore entitled to receive his attorney’s fees unless special circumstances would render such an award unjust.

Judgment: Granted, vacated and remanded in a per curiam opinion on November 5, 2012.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders
Jun 27 2012Application (12A17) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 1, 2012 to July 31, 2012, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Jul 9 2012Application (12A17) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until July 31, 2012.
Jul 31 2012Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 5, 2012)
Sep 5 2012Brief of respondents Dan Wideman, et al. in opposition filed.
Sep 18 2012Reply of petitioner Steve Lefemine filed. (Distributed)
Sep 19 2012DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 5, 2012.
Oct 9 2012DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 12, 2012.
Oct 15 2012DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 26, 2012.
Oct 29 2012DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 2, 2012.
Nov 5 2012Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Opinion per curiam. (Detached Opinion)
Term Snapshot