Johnson v. United States
| Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08-6925 | 11th Cir. |
Oct 6, 2009 Tr. |
Mar 2, 2010 | 7-2 | Scalia | OT 2009 |
Holding: Federal gun laws require an enhanced sentence for defendant who have previously been convicted of a “violent felony.†The Court held that the defendant’s prior conviction for battery in Florida did not count as a “violent felony†because under Florida law, although battery involves physical contact, the prosecution is not required to prove any use of physical force.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Violent force required for violent felony
- Johnson v. United States: What Constitutes "Physical Force"? (Argument Recap)
- Argument Preview : Johnson v. U.S.
Briefs and Documents
Merits Briefs
- Brief for Petitioner Curtis Darnell Johnson
- Brief for Respondent United States of America
- Reply Brief for Petitioner Curtis Darnell Johnson