Issue: (1) Whether the Ninth Circuit correctly held that the “viability”
line from Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey remains the only critical factor
in determining constitutionality, to the exclusion
of other significant governmental interests,
or whether Arizona’s post-twenty-week limitation is facially
valid because it does not pose a substantial obstacle
to a safe abortion; (2) whether the Ninth Circuit erred in declining to recognize
that the State’s interests in preventing documented
fetal pain, protecting against a significantly
increased health risk to the mother, and upholding the integrity of the medical profession
are sufficient to support limitations on abortion
after twenty weeks gestational age when terminating
the pregnancy is not necessary to avert
death or serious health risk to the mother; and (3) whether, if the Ninth Circuit correctly held that its decision
is compelled by this Court’s precedent in Roe v. Wade and its progeny, those precedents should
be revisited in light of the recent, compelling evidence
of fetal pain and significantly increased
health risk to the mother for abortions performed
after twenty weeks gestational age.
“I’m expecting a decision that is either all or nothing. And, I expect that the Court will rule that there is a constitutional right that protects same-sex couples’ right to marry.” Kenji Yoshino, Chief Justice Earl Warren Professor of Constitutional Law at New York University School of Law and author most recently of Marriage Equality […]
Awarded the Peabody Award for excellence in electronic media.
Sigma Delta Chi
Awarded the Sigma Delta Chi deadline reporting award for online coverage of the Affordable Care Act decision.
National Press Club Award
Awarded the National Press Club's Breaking News Award for coverage of the Affordable Care Act decision.
Silver Gavel Award
Awarded the Silver Gavel Award by the American Bar Association for fostering the American public’s understanding of the law and the legal system.
American Gavel Award
Awarded the American Gavel Award for Distinguished Reporting About the Judiciary to recognize the highest standards of reporting about courts and the justice system.
Awarded the Webby Award for excellence on the internet.