Holtz v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Petition for certiorari denied on October 2, 2017
Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
16-1536 7th Cir. N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2017

Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case.

Issue: Whether, and when, a party is properly held to be “alleging” a “misrepresentation or omission of a material fact” within the meaning of the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998, 15 U.S.C. § 78bb(f)(1)(A).

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders
Apr 14 2017Application (16A979) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 23, 2017 to May 24, 2017, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Apr 16 2017Application (16A979) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until May 24, 2017.
May 10 2017Application (16A979) to further extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 24, 2017 to June 22, 2017, submitted to Justice Kagan.
May 11 2017Application (16A979) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until June 22, 2017.
Jun 22 2017Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 24, 2017)
Jul 19 2017Order extending time to file response to petition to and including August 23, 2017.
Aug 23 2017Brief of respondents JPMorgan Chase Bank, et al. in opposition filed.
Sep 05 2017Reply of petitioners Patricia Holtz, et al. filed.
Sep 06 2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/25/2017.
Oct 02 2017Petition DENIED.
 
Share:
Term Snapshot
Awards