Editor's Note :

Editor's Note :

We expect orders from the February 24 conference on Monday at 9:30 a.m. There is a possibility of opinions on Wednesday, March 1.

Hollingsworth v. Perry

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
12-144 9th Cir. Mar 26, 2013
Tr.Aud.
Jun 26, 2013 5-4 Roberts OT 2012
 
Share:

Disclosure: Tejinder Singh of the law firm Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, was among the counsel on an amicus brief filed by international human rights advocates in support of the respondents in this case.

Holding: The proponents of California’s ban on same-sex marriage did not have standing to appeal the district court’s order invalidating the ban.

Plain English Summary:

Judgment: Vacated and remanded, 5-4, in an opinion by Chief Justice Roberts on June 26, 2013. Justice Kennedy filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Thomas, Justice Alito, and Justice Sotomayor joined.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Briefs and Documents

Disclosure: Tejinder Singh of the law firm Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, was among the counsel on an amicus brief filed by international human rights advocates in support of the respondents in this case.   Holding: The proponents of California’s ban on same-sex marriage did not have standing to appeal the district court’s order invalidating the ban.   JudgmentVacated and remanded, 5-4, in an opinion by Chief Justice Roberts on June 26, 2013. Justice Kennedy filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Thomas, Justice Alito, and Justice Sotomayor joined.
Term Snapshot
Awards