Editor's Note :

Editor's Note :

This week we are hosting an online symposium on NIFLA v. Becerra, in which the Supreme Court will consider whether the disclosures required by California’s Reproductive FACT Act violate the free speech clause of the First Amendment. Contributions are available at this link.

Hartley v. Sanchez

Petition for certiorari denied on March 27, 2017
Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
15-1281 10th Cir. N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2016

Issue: Whether individual detectives and an investigator are entitled to qualified immunity from a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim for malicious prosecution based on allegations they knew or should have known the criminal suspect had cognitive limitations making his confession to a crime untrustworthy and not appropriately relied upon by law enforcement to support his arrest.

DateProceedings and Orders
Apr 8 2016Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 16, 2016)
Apr 27 2016Waiver of right of respondent Tyler Sanchez to respond filed.
May 10 2016DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 26, 2016.
May 17 2016Response Requested . (Due June 16, 2016)
Jun 16 2016Brief of respondent Tyler Sanchez in opposition filed.
Jul 1 2016Reply of petitioners Joe Ryan Hartley, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Jul 6 2016DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 26, 2016.
Mar 22 2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 24, 2017.
Mar 27 2017Petition DENIED.
 
Share:
Term Snapshot
Awards