Hamilton v. Lanning

Docket No.
Op. Below
Argument
Mar 22, 2010
Tr.
Opinion
Vote
8-1
Author
Alito
Term

Disclosure: Akin Gump represented the respondent in this case.

Holding: The Court held that a debtor œprojected income refers to future calculations based on actual income rather than those based on past income over a period of years.

Judgment: Affirmed, 8-1, in an opinion by Justice Samuel Alito on June 7, 2010. Justice Scalia dissented.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Briefs and Documents

CLICK HERE FOR FULL VERSION OF THIS STORY

Merits Briefs

Amicus Briefs

[##CERT-STAGE##]

CLICK HERE FOR FULL VERSION OF THIS STORY