Estate of Barabin v. AstenJohnson, Inc.
||Op. Below ||Argument
Issue: Whether, in a federal jury case, a district judge's procedural failure to make detailed findings under Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals regarding important expert testimony requires the appellate court to order a new trial, regardless of whether there was actually any substantive error in the expert testimony heard or not heard by the jury.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders|
|Apr 15 2014||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 19, 2014)|
|May 1 2014||Waiver of right of respondent Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. to respond filed.|
|May 19 2014||Brief of respondent AstenJohnson, Inc. in opposition filed.|
|Jun 2 2014||Reply of petitioners Estate of Henry Barabin, et al. filed.|
|Jun 3 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 19, 2014.|
|Jun 13 2014||Response Requested from Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc.. (Due July 14, 2014)|
|Jul 11 2014||Brief of respondent Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. in opposition filed.|
|Jul 28 2014||Reply of petitioners Estate of Henry Barabin, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jul 30 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 29, 2014.|