Enter your email address to subscribe to updates to this case:
          

Direct Marketing Association v. Brohl

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
13-1032 10th Cir. TBD TBD TBD TBD OT 2014

Issue: Whether the Tax Injunction Act, which provides that “[t]he district courts shall not enjoin, suspend or restrain the assessment, levy or collection of any tax under State law where a plain, speedy and efficient remedy may be had in the courts of such State,” bars federal court jurisdiction over a suit brought by non-taxpayers to enjoin the informational notice and reporting requirements of a state law that neither imposes a tax, nor requires the collection of a tax, but serves only as a secondary aspect of state tax administration.

DateProceedings and Orders
Dec 16 2013Application (13A633) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 30, 2013 to February 28, 2014, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
Dec 19 2013Application (13A633) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until February 28, 2014.
Feb 25 2014Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 31, 2014)
Mar 10 2014Waiver of right of respondent Barbara Brohl, Executive Director, Colorado Department of Revenue to respond filed.
Mar 26 2014DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 18, 2014.
Mar 31 2014Brief amicus curiae of Council on State Taxation filed.
Apr 7 2014Response Requested . (Due May 7, 2014)
Apr 22 2014Order extending time to file response to petition to and including June 6, 2014.
Jun 6 2014Brief of respondent Barbara Brohl, Executive Director, Colorado Department of Revenue in opposition filed. (Distributed)
Jun 10 2014DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 26, 2014.
Jun 17 2014Reply of petitioner Direct Marketing Association filed. (Distributed)
Jun 30 2014DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 30, 2014.
Jul 1 2014Petition GRANTED.
 
Share:
Term Snapshot
Awards