Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.
| Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11-204 | 9th Cir. |
Apr 16, 2012 |
TBD | TBD | TBD | OT 2011 |
Disclaimer: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for and/or contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents the petitioners in this case.
Issue: (1) Whether deference is owed to the Secretary of Labor's interpretation of the Fair Labor Standards Act's outside sales exemption and related regulations; and (2) whether the Fair Labor Standards Act's outside sales exemption applies to pharmaceutical sales representatives.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
Briefs and Documents
Merits briefs for the Petitioners Amicus Briefs Supporting the Petitioners- Brief for the United States
- Brief for the National Employment Lawyers Association
- Brief for Medical Professionals
- Brief for Certified Class of Pharmaceutical Representatives from Johnson & Johnson
- Brief for Pharmaceutical Representatives
