Cavazos v. Smith

Docket No.
Op. Below
Argument
Not Argued
Opinion
Vote
6-3
Author
Per Curiam
Term

Holding: The Ninth Circuit exceeded its authority under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)when it substituted its own judgment for that of a California jury on the question whether the prosecution’s or the defense’s expert witnesses more persuasively explained the cause of a death.

Judgment: Summarily reversed in a per curiam opinion on October 31, 2011. Justice Ginsburg filed a dissenting opinion, which was joined by Justices Breyer and Sotomayor.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Briefs and Documents

CLICK HERE FOR FULL VERSION OF THIS STORY

[##CERT-STAGE##]

CLICK HERE FOR FULL VERSION OF THIS STORY