California State Teachers’ Retirement System v. Alvarez

Pending petition
Docket No.
Op. Below
Argument
TBD
Opinion
TBD
Vote
TBD
Author
TBD
Term
TBD

Issue: Whether, if a court determines that a complaint filed by one shareholder does not plead demand futility with the requisite particularity, the due process clause and the Supreme Court’s decisions in Taylor v. Sturgell and Smith v. Bayer Corp. permit binding other shareholders that were not parties to the initial litigation to that decision, thus barring consideration of whether a new complaint filed by those shareholders pleads sufficient allegations to demonstrate that pre-suit demand was futile.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders
Apr 12 2018Application (17A1104) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 25, 2018 to June 22, 2018, submitted to Justice Alito.
Apr 15 2018Application (17A1104) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until June 22, 2018.
Jun 21 2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 23, 2018)
Jul 06 2018Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 22, 2018
Jul 06 2018Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 23, 2018 to August 22, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
Jul 20 2018Brief amicus curiae of The Council of Institutional Investors filed.
Jul 23 2018Brief amici curiae of Civil Procedure and Constitutional Law Professors filed.
Aug 20 2018Brief of respondents Aida M. Alvarez, et al. in opposition filed.
Sep 05 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
Sep 05 2018Reply of petitioners California State Teachers' Retirement System, et al. filed. (Distributed)

CLICK HERE FOR FULL VERSION OF THIS STORY