Editor's Note :

Editor's Note :

This week we are hosting an online symposium on NIFLA v. Becerra, in which the Supreme Court will consider whether the disclosures required by California’s Reproductive FACT Act violate the free speech clause of the First Amendment. Contributions are available at this link.

C.D., E.F., and G.H. v. United States

Pending petition
Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
16-9672 10th Cir. TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD

Issues: (1) Whether the sentence-modification limits in 18 U.S.C. § 3582 are jurisdictional; and (2) whether a substantial-assistance departure from a statutory mandatory minimum sentence that is higher than the defendant's guideline range categorically renders that defendant ineligible for an 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) sentence reduction.

DateProceedings and Orders
Jun 20 2017Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 24, 2017)
Jul 20 2017Order extending time to file response to petition to and including August 23, 2017.
Aug 14 2017Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including September 22, 2017.
Sep 21 2017Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including October 23, 2017.
Oct 23 2017Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
Nov 06 2017Reply of petitioner C.D., et al. filed. (Distributed)
Nov 09 2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/1/2017.
Dec 04 2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/8/2017.
 
Share:
Term Snapshot
Awards