Burgess v. United States

Docket No.
Op. Below
Argument
Mar 24, 2008
Tr.
Opinion
Vote
TBD
Author
Ginsburg
Term

Issue: 1. Whether the term "felony drug offense" as used in federal statutes requiring imposition of enhanced mandatory minimum 20 years' imprisonment when drug offender has a prior conviction for a felony drug offense must be read in pari materia with federal statutes defining both felony and felony drug offense so as to require imposition of minimum 20-year sentence only if prior drug conviction as both punishable by more than one year in prison and characterized as a felony by controlling law; 2. When the court finds that a criminal statute is ambiguous, must it then turn to the rule of lenity to resolve ambiguity?

Judgment: Affirmed, in an opinion by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on April 16, 2008.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Briefs and Documents

CLICK HERE FOR FULL VERSION OF THIS STORY

Merits briefs (via ABA)

Amicus briefs

CLICK HERE FOR FULL VERSION OF THIS STORY