Editor's Note :

close editor's note Editor's Note :

Our coverage of Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination to the Supreme Court is available at this link.

Enter your email address to subscribe to updates to this case (by doing so, you are accepting the terms in our privacy policy):
          

Biestek v. Berryhill

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
17-1184 6th Cir. TBD TBD TBD TBD OT 2018

Issue: Whether a vocational expert’s testimony can constitute substantial evidence of “other work,” 20 C.F.R. § 404.1520(a)(4)(v), available to an applicant for social security benefits on the basis of a disability, when the expert fails upon the applicant’s request to provide the underlying data on which that testimony is premised.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders
Feb 21 2018Pursuant to Rule 34.6 and Paragraph 9 of the Guidelines for the Submission of Documents to the Supreme Court's Electronic Filing System, filings in this case should be submitted in paper form only, and should not be submitted through the Court's electronic filing system.
Feb 21 2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 26, 2018)
Mar 20 2018Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 26, 2018 to April 25, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
Mar 21 2018Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 25, 2018.
Apr 20 2018Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 14, 2018.
Apr 20 2018Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 25, 2018 to May 14, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
May 14 2018Brief of respondent Nancy A. Berryhill, Deputy Commissioner for Operations, Social Security Administration in opposition filed.
May 21 2018Reply of petitioner Michael J. Biestek filed.
May 22 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/7/2018.
Jun 11 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/14/2018.
Jun 18 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/21/2018.
Jun 25 2018Petition GRANTED.
Jun 25 2018As Rule 34.6 provides, "If the Court schedules briefing and oral argument in a case that was governed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c) or Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 49.1(c), the parties shall submit electronic versions of all prior and subsequent filings with this Court in the case, subject to [applicable] redaction rules." Subsequent party and amicus filings in the case should now be submitted through the Court's electronic filing system, with any necessary redactions.
Jul 13 2018Joint motion to extend the time to file the opening briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including August 27, 2018. The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including October 15, 2018.
Jul 13 2018Joint motion for an extension of time to file the opening briefs on the merits filed.
Aug 03 2018Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner Michael J. Biestek.
Aug 03 2018Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Michael J. Biestek
Aug 27 2018Brief of petitioner Michael J. Biestek filed.
Sep 04 2018Brief amici curiae of National Organization of Social Security Claimants' Representatives, et al. filed.
Sep 04 2018Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Disability Representatives filed.
 
Share:
Term Snapshot
Awards