Editor's Note :

Editor's Note :

There is a possibility of opinions on Wednesday, March 29. We will begin live-blogging at this link at 9:45 a.m.
On Wednesday the court hears oral argument in Turner v. United States. Amy Howe has our preview.
On Wednesday the court also hears oral argument in Honeycutt v. United States. Rory Little has our preview.

Becton, Dickinson and Co. v. Retractable Technologies, Inc.

Petition for certiorari denied on January 7, 2013

Linked with:

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
11-1278 Fed. Cir. N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2012
 
Share:

Issue: (1) Whether the Federal Circuit’s construction of the “lodging” limitation should be reversed because, at the urging of Retractable Technologies, Inc. (RTI), the Federal Circuit deviated from the term’s clear meaning on far weaker grounds than the court relied on to construe the ambiguous term “body”; (2) whether the Federal Circuit’s construction of the “retainer member” limitation should be reversed because, at RTI’s urging, the Federal Circuit deviated from the term’s clear meaning on far weaker grounds than the court relied on to construe the ambiguous term “body”; and (3) whether the Federal Circuit’s holding that the asserted claims cover devices that work by cutting should be reversed because, at RTI’s urging, the Federal Circuit disregarded a clear disclaimer of claim scope on far weaker grounds than the court relied on to construe the ambiguous term “body.”

Plain English Summary:

Briefs and Documents

Certiorari-stage documents

Term Snapshot
Awards