Arizona v. Bahr

Pending petition
Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
16-1369 9th Cir. TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD

Issue: Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit erred in holding, in conflict with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, that the Environmental Protection Agency's interpretation of the Clean Air Act's contingency measures provision, 42 U.S.C. § 7502(c)(9), was arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion or otherwise not in accordance with the law.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders
Mar 07 2017Application (16A885) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 9, 2017 to May 10, 2017, submitted to Justice Kennedy.
Mar 10 2017Application (16A885) granted by Justice Kennedy extending the time to file until May 10, 2017.
May 10 2017Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 15, 2017)
May 22 2017Waiver of right of respondents Sandra L. Bahr, et al. to respond filed.
Jun 09 2017Order extending time to file response to petition to and including July 17, 2017.
Jun 15 2017Brief amici curiae of South Coast Air Quality Management District, et al. filed.
Jul 13 2017Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including August 29, 2017.
Aug 29 2017Brief of Federal Respondents in opposition filed.
Sep 08 2017Reply of petitioner Arizona filed.
Sep 13 2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/6/2017.
Sep 26 2017Response Requested. (Due October 26, 2017)
Oct 12 2017Order extending time to file response to petition to and including November 30, 2017.
 
Share:
Term Snapshot
Awards