Arizona Cattle Growers’ Ass’n v. SalazarPetition for certiorari denied on February 22, 2011
|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|10-454||9th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2010|
Issue: 1) Whether the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) was required to analyze and consider all of the economic impacts that result from designating a particular area as a "critical habitat" under Â§ 4(b)(2) of the Endangered Species Act, including impacts that also may be related to the species being listed as "threatened" or "endangered"; and 2) whether it is lawful for a court to substitute its own rationale for the rationale provided by the FWS to affirm the agency's determination that a particular area, designated as a "critical habitat," is occupied by a threatened or endangered species.