American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles
| Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11-798 | 9th Cir. |
Apr 16, 2013 Tr.Aud. |
TBD | TBD | TBD | OT 2012 |
Issue: Whether 49 U.S.C. § 14501(c)(1), which provides that “a State [or] political subdivision . . . may not enact or enforce a law, regulation, or other provision having the force and effect of law related to a price, route, or service of any motor carrier . . . with respect to the transportation of property,” contains an unexpressed “market participant” exception and permits a municipal governmental entity to take action that conflicts with the express preemption clause, occurs in a market in which the municipal entity does not participate, and is unconnected with any interest in the efficient procurement of services.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Argument preview: When are states market participants – and when does it matter to preemption analysis?
- Petition of the day
- Petition of the day





