Editor's Note :

Editor's Note :

This week we are hosting a symposium on Christie v. NCAA, a challenge to the federal sports-betting ban. Contributions are available at this link.

Steve Vladeck Guest

Stephen I. Vladeck (@steve_vladeck) is a professor of law at the University of Texas School of Law. His teaching and research focus on federal jurisdiction, constitutional law (especially the separation of powers), national security law, and international criminal law.

Date Post Title
Next Page »
07.12.17 Symposium: How the acting solicitor general (sort of) saved the travel ban
06.27.17 Opinion analysis: In Texas capital case, divided court limits scope of “nested” ineffective-assistance claims
04.25.17 Argument analysis: Justices seem inclined to avoid creating “an enormous hole in the doctrine of procedural default” in nested ineffective-assistance case
04.20.17 Opinion analysis: States can’t keep money they collect pursuant to subsequently overturned convictions
04.19.17 Opinion analysis: Justices require notice of appeal from deferred restitution judgments
04.17.17 Argument preview: Another Texas capital case raising a nested ineffective assistance of counsel issue
01.10.17 Argument analysis: Justices skeptical of Colorado’s approach to returning payments by defendants whose convictions are reversed on appeal
01.03.17 Argument preview: Due process and payments by defendants whose convictions are reversed on appeal
10.12.16 Argument analysis: Justices appear skeptical that notices of appeal in criminal cases encompass subsequent restitution determinations
10.04.16 Argument preview: Can an appellate court consider a challenge to the amount of a restitution award as part of an appeal of the underlying sentence?
Term Snapshot
Awards