Editor's Note :

Editor's Note :

This week the blog will publish a multi-part online symposium on United States v. Texas, a challenge by Texas and twenty-five states to the Obama administration's deferred-action policy for immigration. Contributions to this special feature, as well as an “explainer” by this blog's Lyle Denniston, are available here.

Marty Lederman Guest

Date Post Title
« Previous PageNext Page »
03.29.13 Revisiting the Court’s several options in the California marriage case
03.23.13 The spectator line for the marriage cases — update
03.01.13 The Court’s five options in the California marriage case
02.28.13 Two important state amicus briefs in the California marriage case
02.13.13 The single most significant thing about the topside briefs in the same-sex marriage cases [UPDATED]
01.21.13 Understanding standing: The Court’s Article III questions in the same-sex marriage cases (VII)
01.21.13 Understanding standing: The Court’s Article III questions in the same-sex marriage cases (VI)
01.20.13 Understanding standing: The Court’s Article III questions in the same-sex marriage cases (V)
01.19.13 Understanding standing: The Court’s Article III questions in the same-sex marriage cases (IV)
01.18.13 Understanding standing: The Court’s Article III questions in the same-sex marriage cases (III)
Term Snapshot
Awards