Editor's Note :

Editor's Note :

This week the blog will publish a multi-part online symposium on United States v. Texas, a challenge by Texas and twenty-five states to the Obama administration's deferred-action policy for immigration. Contributions to this special feature, as well as an “explainer” by this blog's Lyle Denniston, are available here.

Howard M. Wasserman Guest

Howard M. Wasserman is Professor of Law at FIU Law.

Date Post Title
Next Page »
01.20.16 Argument analysis: The First Amendment, political inactivity, and improper government motive
01.12.16 Argument preview: The First Amendment, public employment, and misperceived political association
12.08.15 Opinion analysis: Removing discretion in convening three-judge district courts
11.05.15 Argument analysis: “Wow . . . That’s my comment” – a passive Court and a predictable outcome on three-judge courts
10.19.15 Argument preview: Is a three-judge court “not required” when a pleading fails to state a claim?
04.23.15 Opinion analysis: Clear statements, sovereign immunity, and timeliness
01.21.15 Opinion analysis: Finality, appealability, and single-claim actions
12.12.14 Argument analysis: A living Federal Tort Claims Act?
12.11.14 Argument analysis: Finality and a tale of two rules
12.08.14 Argument preview: Jurisdictionality, timeliness, and the Federal Tort Claims Act
Term Snapshot
Awards