Editor's Note :

At 9:30 a.m. on Monday, May 20 we expect orders from the May 16 Conference. We expect opinions in argued cases at 10 a.m. We will begin live blogging shortly before 9:30.

Tom Goldstein Publisher

Posted Mon, December 1st, 2008 5:00 pm

Cone v. Bell Reply Brief

Today we’re filing our merits reply brief in Cone v. Bell, which I’ll argue next Tuesday.  The case involves a question of procedural default on habeas corpus and a claim under Brady v. Maryland.  The other briefs in the case — including the State’s merits brief — are available over at SCOTUSwiki.  The Stanford Law School clinic team members are Ruthie Zemel, Jessica Oats, and David Muraskin.  Our co-counsel Paul Bottei also worked closely with us.

Posted in Cone v. Bell, Uncategorized