Menu of today’s content
Here is an overview of today’s case coverage:
7:12 a.m.: Amy Howe covered the federal government’s change in its position in the cases next term consolidated as Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis.
12:56 p.m.: Amy Howe covered the court’s grant in partisan-gerrymandering case Gill v. Whitford.
1:52 p.m.: Amy Howe analyzed the court’s opinion in Packingham v. North Carolina.
2:56 p.m.: Ronald Mann analyzed the court’s opinion in Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of California, San Francisco County.
3:47 p.m.: Mark Walsh provided a “view” from the courtroom for today’s opinion announcements.
4:25 p.m.: Amy Howe analyzed the court’s opinion in McWilliams v. Dunn.
9:03 p.m.: Amy Howe analyzed the court’s opinion in Ziglar v. Abbasi.
We are also hosting a symposium on the court’s ruling in Matal v. Tam, formerly known as Lee v. Tam. Our first contribution is by Caleb Trotter.
CLICK HERE FOR FULL VERSION OF THIS STORY