This morning the Court heard argument in Zubik v. Burwell, a challenge to the Affordable Care Act’s birth-control mandate and the accommodation that the federal government offers to religious non-profits and colleges that object to complying with the mandate.  Lyle Denniston covered the argument for this blog, with other early coverage of the argument coming from Eyder Peralta and Julie Rovner for NPR (with a preview from Nina Totenberg), Pete Williams of NBC News, Peter Sullivan of The Hill, Ariane de Vogue of CNN, Adam Liptak of The New York Times, Lawrence Hurley of Reuters, Richard Wolf of USA Today, Jess Bravin and Louise Radnofsky  of The Wall Street Journal, Robert Barnes of The Washington Post, David G. Savage of the Los Angeles Times, Mark Sherman of the Associated Press, Jennifer Haberkorn and Josh Gerstein of Politico, Greg Stohr of Bloomberg, Tierney Sneed of Talking Points Memo, Chris Geidner of BuzzFeed, Molly Redden of the Guardian, Bill Mears for Fox News, Cristian Farias of Huffington Post, and Mark Walsh for Education Week.

Early commentary comes from Ilya Shapiro at Cato Institute, Ian Millhiser at ThinkProgress, Laura Bassett of Huffington Post, Mark Joseph Stern of Slate, and Emily Crockett of Vox.

Posted in Round-up

Recommended Citation: Molly Runkle, Afternoon round-up: Today’s argument in Zubik v. Burwell, SCOTUSblog (Mar. 23, 2016, 3:48 PM), http://www.scotusblog.com/2016/03/afternoon-round-up-todays-argument-in-zubik-v-burwell/