New Filing: Cert. Reply Brief in Jerman v. Carlisle, et al.

The Court in a second Obama term – Tom Goldstein

Significant feud over an SG brief – Lyle Denniston

Prop. 8: A slow journey to the Court? – Lyle Denniston

New Filing: Cert. Reply Brief in Jerman v. Carlisle, et al.

Justice Sandra Day O’Connor’s Legacy

FCC v. Fox

The Texas redistricting cases

Christmas and the Court

Sackett v. EPA

Calendar: February 2012

Feb. 2012

Most Recent Posts

Calendar: February 2012

Sponsored by Bloomberg Law

Recently Decided Cases

Community Discusssions

Recent Community Comments

This Week at the Court

See allUpcoming Oral Arguments

See allUpcoming Petitions

Term Snapshot

FollowTwitter Feed

ABA Silver Gavel Award Winner

Special Features

Blog Archives

Open Links in New Windows

Conference

Holiday

Freeman v. Quicken Loans (10-1042)

Taniguchi v. Kan Pacific Saipan (10-1472)

Orders

United States v. Alvarez (11-210)

Blueford v. Arkansas (11-1320)

Conference

Elgin v. U.S. Treasury Dept. (11-45)

Wood v. Milyard (10-9995)

Orders

Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum (10-1491)

Mohamad v. Palestinian Authority (11-88)

Armour v. City of Indianapolis (11-161)

Conference of February 17

Posted Thu, June 11th, 2009 11:43 am

Today Howe & Russell is filing this cert. reply brief in No. 08-1200, Jerman v. Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich. The case, which is slated to be considered by the Justices at their June 25 conference, deals with the scope of the bona fide error provision of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. Ed Icove of Cleveland and Steve Felson of Cincinnati are our co-counsel in the case.

Posted in Uncategorized

Full Calendar Submit Event

Orders/Opinions
Arguments
Conferences

Events
Holidays
Multiple

Sponsored by Bloomberg Law
Recently Decided Cases
- National Meat Association v. Harris Preemption by Federal Meat Inspection Act
- Perry v. Perez Texas redistricting
- Reynolds v. United States Standing to challenge sex offender rule
- United States v. Jones Constitutionality of use of GPS tracking device
Community Discusssions
Justice Sandra Day O’Connor’s Legacy
The lasting impact of a key Justice.

FCC v. Fox
Constitutionality of indecency ban in broadcast media

The Texas redistricting cases
Texas's new, legislatively enacted district maps, court-ordered interim maps, and the Voting Rights Act

Christmas and the Court
The Court's traditions and holdings regarding church and state.

Sackett v. EPA
Governmental enforcement of federal environmental laws against private property owners
Recent Community Comments
REVISED REPLY- I apologize for the typos in the first version. There aren’t plaintiffs in these cases in no small part because...
Rick Nagel on 1/23 at 5:38 pm
Rick Nagel – 1 Promoted Comment There aren’t, no doubt, because those displaced by racial preferences lack either the courage,...
Rick Nagel on 1/23 at 5:33 pm
There aren't, no doubt, because those displaced by racial preferences lack either courage,conviction or,perhaps, both. In Parents...
Rick Nagel on 1/23 at 3:59 pm
I wish there were more of these cases, too, Mr. Nagel -- but the point is that there aren't, even though the underlying discrimination...
Roger Clegg on 1/23 at 10:43 am
I thank the staff at Scotusblog for permitting this exchange to continue and moving Roger Clegg's surrebuttal to the right spot. What...
roxanne friedman on 1/21 at 11:02 am
This Week at the Court

The Justices will convene for a private Conference on Friday. Our list of “Petitions to watch” for that Conference is here.
Monday, February 20 is a federal holiday; the February sitting will begin next Tuesday, February 21.
See allUpcoming Oral Arguments
- 2/21Freeman v. Quicken Loans Inc. Unearned fees in real estate
- 2/21Taniguchi v. Kan Pacific Saipan, Ltd. Losing party’s duty to pay winner’s costs of translating foreign-language documents for use at trial.
- 2/22United States v. Alvarez Stolen Valor Act
See allUpcoming Petitions
- Bogan v. City of Chicago Warrantless searches of residences
- E.R.G. v. E.H.G. Grandparent visitation
- Janssen Biotech, Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories Patent written description
- Peninsula School District v. D.P. IDEA exhaustion
Term Snapshot

Cases argued 47

Cases decided 16

Summary reversals 5

Merits cases granted to date 75
FollowTwitter Feed
ABA Silver Gavel Award Winner

Awarded for fostering the American public’s understanding of the law and the legal system.
Special Features
Blog Archives

or
Open Links in New Windows

Check to activate on this page

The Court in a second Obama term	2:04pm on 2/14
Petitions to watch: Conference of February 24, 2012	9:48am on 2/14
Tuesday round-up	8:46am on 2/14
Petition of the day	8:00pm on 2/13
Justice Breyer robbed	4:20pm on 2/13

1
Mock moot of health care case

10
Pro bono panel

17
Conference

21
Freeman v. Quicken Loans (10-1042)
Taniguchi v. Kan Pacific Saipan (10-1472)
Orders

22
United States v. Alvarez (11-210)
Blueford v. Arkansas (11-1320)

24
Conference

27
Elgin v. U.S. Treasury Dept. (11-45)
Wood v. Milyard (10-9995)
Orders

28
Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum (10-1491)
Mohamad v. Palestinian Authority (11-88)

29
Armour v. City of Indianapolis (11-161)

Cases argued	47
Cases decided	16
Summary reversals	5
Merits cases granted to date	75