http://www.scotusblog.com/2008/02/todays-transcripts-38/ The Supreme Court of the United States blog Mon, 23 Jan 2012 22:38:26 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://www.scotusblog.com/2008/02/todays-transcripts-38/#comment-14730 Taylor Reynolds Wed, 20 Feb 2008 20:17:15 +0000 http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/todays-transcripts-38/#comment-14730 It's very interesting -- bordering on startling -- that (a) the Bush administration argued on respondent's side in this case, and (b) they sent Paul Clement to argue it. Very unlike the administration. Any insight into these two features? Did the administration view this as a must-win case for respondent? It’s very interesting — bordering on startling — that (a) the Bush administration argued on respondent’s side in this case, and (b) they sent Paul Clement to argue it. Very unlike the administration. Any insight into these two features? Did the administration view this as a must-win case for respondent?

]]>