<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No need for primary to pick judges</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scotusblog.com/2008/01/no-need-for-primary-to-pick-judges/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/2008/01/no-need-for-primary-to-pick-judges/</link>
	<description>The Supreme Court of the United States blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:56:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard Winger</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/2008/01/no-need-for-primary-to-pick-judges/comment-page-1/#comment-14252</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Winger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 04:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/no-need-for-primary-to-pick-judges/#comment-14252</guid>
		<description>This post contains an error.  Lopez Torres did not argue that it violates the U.S. Constitution for New York law to mandate conventions.  She  knowledged that New York is free to use a party convention.  What she argued was that the particular details of that convention violate the U.S. Constitution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post contains an error.  Lopez Torres did not argue that it violates the U.S. Constitution for New York law to mandate conventions.  She  knowledged that New York is free to use a party convention.  What she argued was that the particular details of that convention violate the U.S. Constitution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
