<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Court takes no action on gun case</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scotusblog.com/2007/11/court-takes-no-action-on-gun-case/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/2007/11/court-takes-no-action-on-gun-case/</link>
	<description>The Supreme Court of the United States blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 22:38:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Mastriani</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/2007/11/court-takes-no-action-on-gun-case/#comment-12951</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Mastriani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 05:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/court-takes-no-action-on-gun-case/#comment-12951</guid>
		<description>As a resident of the state where the amendment
originated, I would like to see the court rule before the mayor of Pa. and his Philadelphia
socilists take our second amendment rights away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a resident of the state where the amendment<br />
originated, I would like to see the court rule before the mayor of Pa. and his Philadelphia<br />
socilists take our second amendment rights away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Call</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/2007/11/court-takes-no-action-on-gun-case/#comment-12934</link>
		<dc:creator>John Call</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 18:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/court-takes-no-action-on-gun-case/#comment-12934</guid>
		<description>The ACLU isn&#039;t anywhere near this issue. It was the American Civil Rights Union that filed an amicus brief on the cert petition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ACLU isn&#8217;t anywhere near this issue. It was the American Civil Rights Union that filed an amicus brief on the cert petition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Wallace</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/2007/11/court-takes-no-action-on-gun-case/#comment-12922</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wallace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 00:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/court-takes-no-action-on-gun-case/#comment-12922</guid>
		<description>The ACLU is a commie organization?  I always thought of it as a lobby for terrorists.  Osama bin Laden&#039;s lobbyist in Washington.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ACLU is a commie organization?  I always thought of it as a lobby for terrorists.  Osama bin Laden&#8217;s lobbyist in Washington.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Hoiriis</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/2007/11/court-takes-no-action-on-gun-case/#comment-12902</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Hoiriis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 02:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/court-takes-no-action-on-gun-case/#comment-12902</guid>
		<description>So I did it again, sorry folks...time for bed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I did it again, sorry folks&#8230;time for bed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Hoiriis</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/2007/11/court-takes-no-action-on-gun-case/#comment-12901</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Hoiriis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 02:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/court-takes-no-action-on-gun-case/#comment-12901</guid>
		<description>Appolgies, I can spell far better than I type!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Appolgies, I can spell far better than I type!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Hoiriis</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/2007/11/court-takes-no-action-on-gun-case/#comment-12900</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Hoiriis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 02:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/court-takes-no-action-on-gun-case/#comment-12900</guid>
		<description>What I can&#039;t fathom is how the National Guard is even mentioned in a second amendment conversation. If you were to read the state consititutions of both MA and NH (states with polar opposite views of private gun ownership) you would find that the militia definition specifically EXCLUDES members of the National Guard from being in the militia.  Their definition of  militia is crystal clear that all other citizens over 18 are in the militia.  That then would be the &quot;people&quot; and not the National Guard have thier rights protected by the constitution.  This should be a non-issue and D.C. should not have been able to violate the rights of its citizens for over 30 years any more than Ray Negian and Eddie Compass should have been allowed to infringe the 2nd A rights of the citizens of New Orleans after Katrina.  The real question should be not wether of not SCOTUS will take Heller, but how the hell did this get this far?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I can&#8217;t fathom is how the National Guard is even mentioned in a second amendment conversation. If you were to read the state consititutions of both MA and NH (states with polar opposite views of private gun ownership) you would find that the militia definition specifically EXCLUDES members of the National Guard from being in the militia.  Their definition of  militia is crystal clear that all other citizens over 18 are in the militia.  That then would be the &#8220;people&#8221; and not the National Guard have thier rights protected by the constitution.  This should be a non-issue and D.C. should not have been able to violate the rights of its citizens for over 30 years any more than Ray Negian and Eddie Compass should have been allowed to infringe the 2nd A rights of the citizens of New Orleans after Katrina.  The real question should be not wether of not SCOTUS will take Heller, but how the hell did this get this far?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lauren Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/2007/11/court-takes-no-action-on-gun-case/#comment-12886</link>
		<dc:creator>Lauren Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 16:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/court-takes-no-action-on-gun-case/#comment-12886</guid>
		<description>Marcus, can please explain your disagreement with Robert&#039;s analysis?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marcus, can please explain your disagreement with Robert&#8217;s analysis?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus Poulin</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/2007/11/court-takes-no-action-on-gun-case/#comment-12885</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus Poulin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/court-takes-no-action-on-gun-case/#comment-12885</guid>
		<description>Robert you&#039;re totally wrong.
No serious Con law scholar would
give you much intellectual veracity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert you&#8217;re totally wrong.</p>
<p>No serious Con law scholar would<br />
give you much intellectual veracity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Fennema</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/2007/11/court-takes-no-action-on-gun-case/#comment-12884</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Fennema</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/court-takes-no-action-on-gun-case/#comment-12884</guid>
		<description>The ACLU is not taking our side Eric.
At least not at this point and probably never.
Remember ,its a Commie organization.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ACLU is not taking our side Eric.<br />
At least not at this point and probably never.<br />
Remember ,its a Commie organization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: william collins</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/2007/11/court-takes-no-action-on-gun-case/#comment-12882</link>
		<dc:creator>william collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 14:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/court-takes-no-action-on-gun-case/#comment-12882</guid>
		<description>hoorah,john spencer has hit the nail on the head.
each and every amendment is for the individual,
and so is the 2nd. otherwise their all useless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hoorah,john spencer has hit the nail on the head.<br />
each and every amendment is for the individual,<br />
and so is the 2nd. otherwise their all useless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

