At 10 a.m, the Court is scheduled to hear oral argument in United States v. Williams (06-694), asking whether a federal ban on pandering material believed to be child pornography is unconstitutional. Solicitor General Paul Clement will argue for the petitioner, and Richard J. Diaz of Coral Gables, Fla., will argue for the respondent.

At 11 a.m, the Court is scheduled to hear oral argument in Logan v. United States (06-6911), asking whether the Armed Career Criminal Act exempts state convictions for which civil rights were not originally revoked. Richard A. Coad of Madison, Wisc., will argue for the petitioner, and Daryl Joseffer will argue for the respondent.

We will posts links to the argument transcripts as soon as they become available.

Posted in Uncategorized