<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Round-Up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scotusblog.com/2007/07/round-up-157/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/2007/07/round-up-157/</link>
	<description>The Supreme Court of the United States blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 22:38:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David.Huberman</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/2007/07/round-up-157/#comment-11627</link>
		<dc:creator>David.Huberman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 22:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/round-up-157/#comment-11627</guid>
		<description>Tom Goldstein: you&#039;re quoted at the end of Bill Schneider&#039;s article, in which you indicate the only likely retirees are &quot;on the left&quot;.  While I agree Stevens and Ginsburg are likely close to retirement, I thought Justice Thomas was on record as indicating he wasn&#039;t interested in staying for life? Notably, Justice Scalia is 71, and has a big family. I think anyone predicting the next retiree (or, sadly, death) needs to consider Thomas and Scalia, too.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom Goldstein: you&#8217;re quoted at the end of Bill Schneider&#8217;s article, in which you indicate the only likely retirees are &#8220;on the left&#8221;.  While I agree Stevens and Ginsburg are likely close to retirement, I thought Justice Thomas was on record as indicating he wasn&#8217;t interested in staying for life? Notably, Justice Scalia is 71, and has a big family. I think anyone predicting the next retiree (or, sadly, death) needs to consider Thomas and Scalia, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

