Comments on: D.C. begins its gun law appeal http://www.scotusblog.com/2007/07/dc-begins-its-gun-law-appeal/ The Supreme Court of the United States blog Mon, 23 Jan 2012 22:38:26 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Militiapurpose http://www.scotusblog.com/2007/07/dc-begins-its-gun-law-appeal/#comment-11682 Militiapurpose Tue, 17 Jul 2007 19:29:41 +0000 http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/dc-begins-its-gun-law-appeal/#comment-11682 Certainly the Parker decision should be reversed. The Brady Center has posted two entries in a "rolling critique" of the opinion. The first entry, Mangling Miller, explained how the court defied the binding interpretation of the Second Amendment set out almost 70 years ago in U.S. v. Miller. The newest entry, Decision by Eraser, explains how, in its zest to find the Second Amendment protects "private purposes," chose to obliterate the first half of the Amendment and its militia purpose. Both are found at www.gunlawsuits.org. -Brian J. Siebel Certainly the Parker decision should be reversed. The Brady Center has posted two entries in a “rolling critique” of the opinion. The first entry, Mangling Miller, explained how the court defied the binding interpretation of the Second Amendment set out almost 70 years ago in U.S. v. Miller. The newest entry, Decision by Eraser, explains how, in its zest to find the Second Amendment protects “private purposes,” chose to obliterate the first half of the Amendment and its militia purpose. Both are found at http://www.gunlawsuits.org.

-Brian J. Siebel

]]>