<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Government: No &#8220;original&#8221; writ for detainees</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scotusblog.com/2007/05/government-no-original-writ-for-detainees/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/2007/05/government-no-original-writ-for-detainees/</link>
	<description>The Supreme Court of the United States blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 22:38:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent Scheidegger</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/2007/05/government-no-original-writ-for-detainees/#comment-11241</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent Scheidegger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 21:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/government-no-original-writ-for-detainees/#comment-11241</guid>
		<description>Stern at 591:  &quot;Indeed, not since 1925 has any petitioner been successful in obtaining release on a habeas petition filed directly with the Court.  See &lt;i&gt;Ex parte Grossman&lt;/i&gt;, 267 U.S. 87 (1925).&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stern at 591:  &#8220;Indeed, not since 1925 has any petitioner been successful in obtaining release on a habeas petition filed directly with the Court.  See <i>Ex parte Grossman</i>, 267 U.S. 87 (1925).&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phillip Edens</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/2007/05/government-no-original-writ-for-detainees/#comment-11240</link>
		<dc:creator>Phillip Edens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 20:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/government-no-original-writ-for-detainees/#comment-11240</guid>
		<description>Marc, I&#039;m probably way off on this and if anyone knows the correct answer by all means correct me.
Looking through Lexis I&#039;ve found one called
&quot;Ex parte Crow Dog 109 U.S. 556; 3 S. Ct. 396; 27 L. Ed. 1030; 1883 U.S. LEXIS 997&quot;
It looks to be an original jurisdiction case involving Indian Territory in the Dakotas of a man sentenced to death.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marc, I&#8217;m probably way off on this and if anyone knows the correct answer by all means correct me.<br />
Looking through Lexis I&#8217;ve found one called<br />
&#8220;Ex parte Crow Dog 109 U.S. 556; 3 S. Ct. 396; 27 L. Ed. 1030; 1883 U.S. LEXIS 997&#8243;</p>
<p>It looks to be an original jurisdiction case involving Indian Territory in the Dakotas of a man sentenced to death.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Shepherd</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/2007/05/government-no-original-writ-for-detainees/#comment-11239</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Shepherd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 17:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/government-no-original-writ-for-detainees/#comment-11239</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think the Court would choose to decide the Constitutional issue when Ali has not yet exhausted his remedies elsewhere.
When was the last time the Court granted an original writ of habeas corpus?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think the Court would choose to decide the Constitutional issue when Ali has not yet exhausted his remedies elsewhere.</p>
<p>When was the last time the Court granted an original writ of habeas corpus?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

