Comments on: Narrower role for Court on electronic spying? http://www.scotusblog.com/2007/04/narrower-role-for-court-on-electronic-spying/ The Supreme Court of the United States blog Tue, 14 Feb 2012 20:42:12 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Roy D. James http://www.scotusblog.com/2007/04/narrower-role-for-court-on-electronic-spying/#comment-14856 Roy D. James Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:38:13 +0000 http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/narrower-role-for-court-on-electronic-spying/#comment-14856 It's hard to say yes. I know we need to act on terrorism before it happens, but it also invades the privacy act! It’s hard to say yes. I know we need to act on terrorism before it happens, but it also invades the privacy act!

]]> By: Austin Evers http://www.scotusblog.com/2007/04/narrower-role-for-court-on-electronic-spying/#comment-11085 Austin Evers Tue, 17 Apr 2007 03:06:49 +0000 http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/narrower-role-for-court-on-electronic-spying/#comment-11085 This is very interesting as a strategic move. Are there links to the news coverage you mention? I can't imagine that the Democratic Congress would entertain such a bill--hell, I doubt Arlen Specter would consider it were he still in charge--so what's the point? This is very interesting as a strategic move. Are there links to the news coverage you mention?

I can’t imagine that the Democratic Congress would entertain such a bill–hell, I doubt Arlen Specter would consider it were he still in charge–so what’s the point?

]]>