<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Ask the Author&#8221; with Jeff Rosen: Part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scotusblog.com/2007/01/ask-the-author-with-jeff-rosen-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/2007/01/ask-the-author-with-jeff-rosen-part-1/</link>
	<description>The Supreme Court of the United States blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 22:38:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Nagel</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/2007/01/ask-the-author-with-jeff-rosen-part-1/#comment-10913</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Nagel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 17:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/ask-the-author-with-jeff-rosen-part-1/#comment-10913</guid>
		<description>How would Professor Rosen respond to Professor Levinson&#039;s cogent argument against the justices papering overing their diferences in the interest of maintaining the court&#039;s legitimacy?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How would Professor Rosen respond to Professor Levinson&#8217;s cogent argument against the justices papering overing their diferences in the interest of maintaining the court&#8217;s legitimacy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

