<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Today&#8217;s Argument in Jones v. Flowers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scotusblog.com/2006/01/todays-argument-in-jones-v-flowers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/2006/01/todays-argument-in-jones-v-flowers/</link>
	<description>The Supreme Court of the United States blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 22:38:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveL</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/2006/01/todays-argument-in-jones-v-flowers/#comment-8641</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 21:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/todays-argument-in-jones-v-flowers/#comment-8641</guid>
		<description>I thought the one thing we got by having Bush in the White House was some kind of assurance that &quot;Jones,&quot; &quot;Flowers,&quot; and &quot;Little Rock, Arkansas&quot; would never again show up in the first paragraph of a statement of facts of a case before the Supreme Court.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the one thing we got by having Bush in the White House was some kind of assurance that &#8220;Jones,&#8221; &#8220;Flowers,&#8221; and &#8220;Little Rock, Arkansas&#8221; would never again show up in the first paragraph of a statement of facts of a case before the Supreme Court.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

