http://www.scotusblog.com/2006/01/cases-to-be-held-over-and-reargued/ The Supreme Court of the United States blog Mon, 23 Jan 2012 22:38:26 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://www.scotusblog.com/2006/01/cases-to-be-held-over-and-reargued/#comment-8688 Chris Casper Tue, 24 Jan 2006 21:08:09 +0000 http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/cases-to-be-held-over-and-reargued/#comment-8688 A candidate is Buckeye v. Cardegna, No. 04-1264, argued November 30, where the question presented is whether an arbitration agreement in an illegal agreement is enforceable (restated). I am one of the attorneys for Cardegna and I can say based on the oral argument that the vote could come out just about any way, including 4-4 (minus O'Connor). A candidate is Buckeye v. Cardegna, No. 04-1264, argued November 30, where the question presented is whether an arbitration agreement in an illegal agreement is enforceable (restated). I am one of the attorneys for Cardegna and I can say based on the oral argument that the vote could come out just about any way, including 4-4 (minus O’Connor).

]]> http://www.scotusblog.com/2006/01/cases-to-be-held-over-and-reargued/#comment-8687 LegalThoughts Mon, 23 Jan 2006 19:36:38 +0000 http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/cases-to-be-held-over-and-reargued/#comment-8687 This one may be obvious, but I'll offer it anyway. I'm thinking of House v. Bell, the contentious death-penalty case that divided the en banc Sixth Circuit 8-7. Given SOC's decisive votes in recent death cases (e.g., Rompilla, reversing Alito) and her key role in the Court's "actual innocence" jurisprudence (e.g., Schlup v. Delo), I would expect her to play an equally important role in the House decision. Of course, an order setting the case for reargument would probably be pretty bad news for Mr. House. This one may be obvious, but I’ll offer it anyway. I’m thinking of House v. Bell, the contentious death-penalty case that divided the en banc Sixth Circuit 8-7. Given SOC’s decisive votes in recent death cases (e.g., Rompilla, reversing Alito) and her key role in the Court’s “actual innocence” jurisprudence (e.g., Schlup v. Delo), I would expect her to play an equally important role in the House decision. Of course, an order setting the case for reargument would probably be pretty bad news for Mr. House.

]]> http://www.scotusblog.com/2006/01/cases-to-be-held-over-and-reargued/#comment-8686 tab Mon, 23 Jan 2006 16:07:05 +0000 http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/cases-to-be-held-over-and-reargued/#comment-8686 What do you think of Hudson v Michigan, the "knock and announce/exclusionary rule" case. Subtracting O'Connor, the Court appeared possibly split 4-4 at argument (and from past performance, given that some justices--e.g. Thomas--asked few questions. What do you think of Hudson v Michigan, the “knock and announce/exclusionary rule” case. Subtracting O’Connor, the Court appeared possibly split 4-4 at argument (and from past performance, given that some justices–e.g. Thomas–asked few questions.

]]>