<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Herbal tea case: a government loss?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scotusblog.com/2005/11/herbal-tea-case-a-government-loss/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/2005/11/herbal-tea-case-a-government-loss/</link>
	<description>The Supreme Court of the United States blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 22:38:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ecacofonix</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/2005/11/herbal-tea-case-a-government-loss/#comment-8246</link>
		<dc:creator>ecacofonix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 18:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/herbal-tea-case-a-government-loss/#comment-8246</guid>
		<description>&quot;Was the religious practice sincere, and did the government show it had a compelling interest in stopping the practice?&quot;
I think this sentence in a way sums up the defense argument, and I must say, it was rather well said...the truth is, for any blanket rule/law, there are most times going to be a set of entities that might need exception, and this argument is a nice way to evaluate whether the exception indeed is deserved...
CO @ &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.castoroil.in&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Castor Oil&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Was the religious practice sincere, and did the government show it had a compelling interest in stopping the practice?&#8221;</p>
<p>I think this sentence in a way sums up the defense argument, and I must say, it was rather well said&#8230;the truth is, for any blanket rule/law, there are most times going to be a set of entities that might need exception, and this argument is a nice way to evaluate whether the exception indeed is deserved&#8230;</p>
<p>CO @ <a href="http://www.castoroil.in" rel="nofollow">Castor Oil</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter G</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/2005/11/herbal-tea-case-a-government-loss/#comment-8245</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 01:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/herbal-tea-case-a-government-loss/#comment-8245</guid>
		<description>Excellent post, Lyle.  Thank you.  Nancy Hollander is a former national president of the National Ass&#039;n of Criminal Defense Lawyers.  She is recognized among her peers as an expert on international criminal law.  She has taken a leading role in recruiting and training volunteer defense counsel for the International Criminal Court and the various specialized U.N. war crimes tribunals.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post, Lyle.  Thank you.  Nancy Hollander is a former national president of the National Ass&#8217;n of Criminal Defense Lawyers.  She is recognized among her peers as an expert on international criminal law.  She has taken a leading role in recruiting and training volunteer defense counsel for the International Criminal Court and the various specialized U.N. war crimes tribunals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

