Comments on: The Roberts Hearings, Day Two http://www.scotusblog.com/2005/09/the-roberts-hearings-day-two/ The Supreme Court of the United States blog Mon, 23 Jan 2012 22:38:26 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: The Federalist Society at Yale Law School http://www.scotusblog.com/2005/09/the-roberts-hearings-day-two/#comment-7943 The Federalist Society at Yale Law School Wed, 14 Sep 2005 04:00:02 +0000 http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/the-roberts-hearings-day-two/#comment-7943 <strong>Blogging the Hearings, Part 2</strong> This is the second installment in a four-part series on the confirmation hearings for Judge Roberts. The first part is available here. How did Jay Sekulow get to be so well connected? The last time I was at the Court,... Blogging the Hearings, Part 2

This is the second installment in a four-part series on the confirmation hearings for Judge Roberts. The first part is available here. How did Jay Sekulow get to be so well connected? The last time I was at the Court,…

]]> By: TalkLeft: The Politics of Crime http://www.scotusblog.com/2005/09/the-roberts-hearings-day-two/#comment-7942 TalkLeft: The Politics of Crime Wed, 14 Sep 2005 03:18:08 +0000 http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/the-roberts-hearings-day-two/#comment-7942 <strong>Roberts Hearing: Day Two</strong> Update: Law Prof Glenn Reynolds, writing over at his MSNBC blog, sums up a general consensus of opinion on today's hearings: The Senators bloviated, speechified and repeatedly touted themselves. In agreement: Slate's Dahlia Lathwick, Ann Althouse and m... Roberts Hearing: Day Two

Update: Law Prof Glenn Reynolds, writing over at his MSNBC blog, sums up a general consensus of opinion on today’s hearings: The Senators bloviated, speechified and repeatedly touted themselves. In agreement: Slate’s Dahlia Lathwick, Ann Althouse and m…

]]> By: Law Dork http://www.scotusblog.com/2005/09/the-roberts-hearings-day-two/#comment-7941 Law Dork Wed, 14 Sep 2005 02:43:05 +0000 http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/the-roberts-hearings-day-two/#comment-7941 <strong>Roberts on the Hot Seat</strong> From Roe to Youngstown Sheet & Tube, today's hearings on Judge John Roberts nomination to serve as the Chief Justice of the United States are getting very interesting. Per Tom Goldstein: 10:12 - Leahy asks about a memo by Jay... Roberts on the Hot Seat

From Roe to Youngstown Sheet & Tube, today’s hearings on Judge John Roberts nomination to serve as the Chief Justice of the United States are getting very interesting. Per Tom Goldstein: 10:12 – Leahy asks about a memo by Jay…

]]> By: Adam White http://www.scotusblog.com/2005/09/the-roberts-hearings-day-two/#comment-7936 Adam White Wed, 14 Sep 2005 01:50:40 +0000 http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/the-roberts-hearings-day-two/#comment-7936 Of course, <a href="http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2005_09_11-2005_09_17.shtml#1126558476" rel="nofollow">Volokh.com is a much more likely nominee ...</a> . Of course, Volokh.com is a much more likely nominee … .

]]> By: Adam White http://www.scotusblog.com/2005/09/the-roberts-hearings-day-two/#comment-7935 Adam White Tue, 13 Sep 2005 23:02:02 +0000 http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/the-roberts-hearings-day-two/#comment-7935 It appears that <a href="http://mediagirl.org/article/matsu/2005/09/supreme-court-as-umpires-how-dumb-do-they-think-we-are" rel="nofollow">this could be the blog</a> that Senator Cornyn is reading. http://mediagirl.org/article/matsu/2005/09/supreme-court-as-umpires-how-dumb-do-they-think-we-are It appears that this could be the blog that Senator Cornyn is reading.

http://mediagirl.org/article/matsu/2005/09/supreme-court-as-umpires-how-dumb-do-they-think-we-are

]]> By: Adam White http://www.scotusblog.com/2005/09/the-roberts-hearings-day-two/#comment-7934 Adam White Tue, 13 Sep 2005 20:01:51 +0000 http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/the-roberts-hearings-day-two/#comment-7934 Gregory, As noted in Judge Bork's *The Tempting of America,* Dred Scott is nothing if it is not the first application of "substantive due process." Gregory,

As noted in Judge Bork’s *The Tempting of America,* Dred Scott is nothing if it is not the first application of “substantive due process.”

]]> By: Chris http://www.scotusblog.com/2005/09/the-roberts-hearings-day-two/#comment-7933 Chris Tue, 13 Sep 2005 19:59:32 +0000 http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/the-roberts-hearings-day-two/#comment-7933 "His life, he explains, establishes that he obviously doesn't believes in equal rights for women." Should be either "believes" or "does believe," shouldn't it? “His life, he explains, establishes that he obviously doesn’t believes in equal rights for women.” Should be either “believes” or “does believe,” shouldn’t it?

]]> By: Lee Blog http://www.scotusblog.com/2005/09/the-roberts-hearings-day-two/#comment-7940 Lee Blog Tue, 13 Sep 2005 19:34:17 +0000 http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/the-roberts-hearings-day-two/#comment-7940 <strong>SCOTUS Blog at Roberts hearings: Roberts on use of foreign law by US courts</strong> SCOTUS Blog has a truly impressive blow-by-blow (er, question-by-question) rundown of Judge Roberts's confirmation hearings. For those of us stuck at work, this is really helpful. Here's one Q&A that interests me: the use of foreign law by U.S. courts:... SCOTUS Blog at Roberts hearings: Roberts on use of foreign law by US courts

SCOTUS Blog has a truly impressive blow-by-blow (er, question-by-question) rundown of Judge Roberts’s confirmation hearings. For those of us stuck at work, this is really helpful. Here’s one Q&A that interests me: the use of foreign law by U.S. courts:…

]]> By: Simon http://www.scotusblog.com/2005/09/the-roberts-hearings-day-two/#comment-7932 Simon Tue, 13 Sep 2005 18:49:58 +0000 http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/the-roberts-hearings-day-two/#comment-7932 Gregory, I find it rather hard to entertain the idea that Dred Scott is a strict constructionist opinion, given that the case was essentially decided on substantive due process grounds. Are you using "strict constructionist" as a generic expletive, or can you justify your assertion? Gregory,
I find it rather hard to entertain the idea that Dred Scott is a strict constructionist opinion, given that the case was essentially decided on substantive due process grounds. Are you using “strict constructionist” as a generic expletive, or can you justify your assertion?

]]> By: Kent Scheidegger http://www.scotusblog.com/2005/09/the-roberts-hearings-day-two/#comment-7931 Kent Scheidegger Tue, 13 Sep 2005 18:43:02 +0000 http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/the-roberts-hearings-day-two/#comment-7931 Bravo! Roberts hit it out of the park on the misuse of international law to "interpret" the U.S. Constitution, a subterfuge for getting to the result the judge wanted in the first place. Bravo! Roberts hit it out of the park on the misuse of international law to “interpret” the U.S. Constitution, a subterfuge for getting to the result the judge wanted in the first place.

]]>