<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SOC Retires</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scotusblog.com/2005/07/soc-retires/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/2005/07/soc-retires/</link>
	<description>The Supreme Court of the United States blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 22:38:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: On the Wright</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/2005/07/soc-retires/#comment-7730</link>
		<dc:creator>On the Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2005 15:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/soc-retires/#comment-7730</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Sandra D is Gone&lt;/strong&gt;
I know that future generations will now be spared even more confusing test and &quot;reasonable basis&quot; type of explanations which are great for finals questions but hell on students, which is always a good thing.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Sandra D is Gone</strong></p>
<p>I know that future generations will now be spared even more confusing test and &#8220;reasonable basis&#8221; type of explanations which are great for finals questions but hell on students, which is always a good thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pennywit.Com</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/2005/07/soc-retires/#comment-7729</link>
		<dc:creator>Pennywit.Com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2005 15:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/soc-retires/#comment-7729</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;O&#039;Connor Steps Down&lt;/strong&gt;
According to CNN, Justice Sandra Day O&#039;Connor will step down from the Supreme Court today:
O&#039;Connor, 75, said she will leave before the start of the court&#039;s next term in October, or when the Senate confirms her successor. There was no immediate word from
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>O&#8217;Connor Steps Down</strong></p>
<p>According to CNN, Justice Sandra Day O&#8217;Connor will step down from the Supreme Court today:<br />
O&#8217;Connor, 75, said she will leave before the start of the court&#8217;s next term in October, or when the Senate confirms her successor. There was no immediate word from</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Glittering Eye</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/2005/07/soc-retires/#comment-7728</link>
		<dc:creator>The Glittering Eye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2005 15:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/soc-retires/#comment-7728</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Justice O&#039;Connor resigns:  blogospheric reaction&lt;/strong&gt;
As I mentioned in my morning rundown, Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O&#039;Connor has resigned: WASHINGTON -- Justice Sandra Day O&#039;Connor, the first woman appointed to the Supreme Court and a key swing vote on issues such as abortion and...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Justice O&#8217;Connor resigns:  blogospheric reaction</strong></p>
<p>As I mentioned in my morning rundown, Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O&#8217;Connor has resigned: WASHINGTON &#8212; Justice Sandra Day O&#8217;Connor, the first woman appointed to the Supreme Court and a key swing vote on issues such as abortion and&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StrangeThingsAfoot.com</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/2005/07/soc-retires/#comment-7727</link>
		<dc:creator>StrangeThingsAfoot.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2005 15:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/soc-retires/#comment-7727</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;http://strangethingsafoot.com/?p=280&lt;/strong&gt;
The blogosphere will be awash in the news of Sandra Day O&#8217;Connor&#8217;s retirement.  The commentary, particularly from the law professors, will be most interesting.  Even if you don&#8217;t know much about law or think you don&#8217;t care, I u...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://strangethingsafoot.com/?p=280" rel="nofollow">http://strangethingsafoot.com/?p=280</a></strong></p>
<p>The blogosphere will be awash in the news of Sandra Day O&#8217;Connor&#8217;s retirement.  The commentary, particularly from the law professors, will be most interesting.  Even if you don&#8217;t know much about law or think you don&#8217;t care, I u&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Appellate Law</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/2005/07/soc-retires/#comment-7726</link>
		<dc:creator>Appellate Law</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2005 14:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/soc-retires/#comment-7726</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;CNN Says  Sandra Day O&#039;Connor retiring&lt;/strong&gt;
See the SCOTUSblog, as they might have embargoed information.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>CNN Says  Sandra Day O&#8217;Connor retiring</strong></p>
<p>See the SCOTUSblog, as they might have embargoed information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Election Law</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/2005/07/soc-retires/#comment-7725</link>
		<dc:creator>Election Law</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2005 14:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/soc-retires/#comment-7725</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Is Justice O&#039;Connor About to Retire?&lt;/strong&gt;
See here and here. UPDATE: This is now confirmed on the NYT&#039;s web page. See my post on June 22 with this rumor and the Justice&#039;s possible replacement....
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Is Justice O&#8217;Connor About to Retire?</strong></p>
<p>See here and here. UPDATE: This is now confirmed on the NYT&#8217;s web page. See my post on June 22 with this rumor and the Justice&#8217;s possible replacement&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Election Law</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/2005/07/soc-retires/#comment-7724</link>
		<dc:creator>Election Law</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2005 14:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/soc-retires/#comment-7724</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Is Justice O&#039;Connor About to Retire?&lt;/strong&gt;
See here and here....
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Is Justice O&#8217;Connor About to Retire?</strong></p>
<p>See here and here&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

