<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vermont Campaign Finance Ruling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scotusblog.com/2005/06/vermont-campaign-finance-ruling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/2005/06/vermont-campaign-finance-ruling/</link>
	<description>The Supreme Court of the United States blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 22:38:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Election Law</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/2005/06/vermont-campaign-finance-ruling/#comment-7300</link>
		<dc:creator>Election Law</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2005 01:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/vermont-campaign-finance-ruling/#comment-7300</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;How Smart Was It for Plaintiffs to Support Cert in the Vermont Spending Limits Case?&lt;/strong&gt;
You can find six amicus briefs supporting the winning side of the Second Circuit Sorrell case here. Usually, of course, the side that wins in the Court of Appeals opposes a grant of cert. But for years it has been...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>How Smart Was It for Plaintiffs to Support Cert in the Vermont Spending Limits Case?</strong></p>
<p>You can find six amicus briefs supporting the winning side of the Second Circuit Sorrell case here. Usually, of course, the side that wins in the Court of Appeals opposes a grant of cert. But for years it has been&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymouse</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/2005/06/vermont-campaign-finance-ruling/#comment-7298</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2005 23:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/vermont-campaign-finance-ruling/#comment-7298</guid>
		<description>Legal Affairs reports today that Vermont has now also petitioned for cert in this case.  Does anyone know if the petition is posted anywhere online?
ML responds:  It&#039;s almost certainly not a petition, but instead an acquiescence.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Legal Affairs reports today that Vermont has now also petitioned for cert in this case.  Does anyone know if the petition is posted anywhere online?</p>
<p>ML responds:  It&#8217;s almost certainly not a petition, but instead an acquiescence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Election Law</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/2005/06/vermont-campaign-finance-ruling/#comment-7299</link>
		<dc:creator>Election Law</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2005 17:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/vermont-campaign-finance-ruling/#comment-7299</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;&quot;BROAD COALITION URGES US SUPREME COURT TO REVIEW CAMPAIGN SPENDING LIMITS CASE&quot;&lt;/strong&gt;
NVRI has posted this press release on the Vermont spending limits case. It begins: &quot;- A broad coalition of United States Senators, state attorneys general, former US Senators Bill Bradley and Alan Simpson, and others filed a series of legal...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>&#8220;BROAD COALITION URGES US SUPREME COURT TO REVIEW CAMPAIGN SPENDING LIMITS CASE&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>NVRI has posted this press release on the Vermont spending limits case. It begins: &#8220;- A broad coalition of United States Senators, state attorneys general, former US Senators Bill Bradley and Alan Simpson, and others filed a series of legal&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

