<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Raich as Constitutional Law Doctrine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scotusblog.com/2005/06/raich-as-constitutional-law-doctrine-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/2005/06/raich-as-constitutional-law-doctrine-2/</link>
	<description>The Supreme Court of the United States blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 22:38:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calblog</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/2005/06/raich-as-constitutional-law-doctrine-2/#comment-7077</link>
		<dc:creator>Calblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2005 23:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/raich-as-constitutional-law-doctrine-2/#comment-7077</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Ashcroft v. Raich - The Supreme Court on Federalism&lt;/strong&gt;
After trekking through the 9th Circuit, the long awaited decision in Ashcroft v. Raich is finally here. (Along with a concurrence and a dissent or two). Larry Solumn provides a good summary of the arguments here. As is usually the...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ashcroft v. Raich &#8211; The Supreme Court on Federalism</strong></p>
<p>After trekking through the 9th Circuit, the long awaited decision in Ashcroft v. Raich is finally here. (Along with a concurrence and a dissent or two). Larry Solumn provides a good summary of the arguments here. As is usually the&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Volokh Conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/2005/06/raich-as-constitutional-law-doctrine-2/#comment-7076</link>
		<dc:creator>The Volokh Conspiracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2005 18:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/raich-as-constitutional-law-doctrine-2/#comment-7076</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Rehnquist Court and Symbolic Federalism:&lt;/strong&gt;
In response to my earlier post, Tom Goldstein writes:&lt;blockquote&gt;&#160;&#160;I agree with Orin&#039;s comment . . . that Raich on one level seems unremarkab...&lt;/blockquote&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Rehnquist Court and Symbolic Federalism:</strong></p>
<p>In response to my earlier post, Tom Goldstein writes:<br />
<blockquote>&nbsp;&nbsp;I agree with Orin&#8217;s comment . . . that Raich on one level seems unremarkab&#8230;</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

