Commentary: Justice Kennedy and the “war on drugs”
Justice Anthony M. Kennedy’s role in Monday’s 6-3 decision in Gonzales v. Raich, upholding sweeping power for Congress to criminalize even personal, medical use of marijuana, may be baffling from the perspective of his accustomed role in supporting state power against overreaching congressional legislation. But there is perhaps a different, and simpler, explanation for his vote with the majority (his silent vote, as Ann Althouse points out in her post below). Kennedy, it has been clear for some time, has little tolerance, judicial or otherwise, for those who are users of drugs, or who resist drug control measures.
Three fairly recent examples suggest that the Justice has a zero-tolerance point of view.
Two are other “silent” votes he has cast: joining the opinion written by Justice Clarence Thomas in U.S. v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers’ Cooperative, decided May 14, 2001, finding no medical necessity exception to the Controlled Substances Act, and joining Thomas’ 6-3 opinion in Board of Education of Independent School District No. 92 of Pottawatomie County v. Earls, decided June 27, 2002, upholding the most sweeping drug-testing policy yet to come before the Court — a testing requirement for any public school student seeking to take part in any extracurricular activity, the near-equivalent of a universal testing policy.
The third example is perhaps the most telling: when the Earls case came before the Court, there was evidence that the young woman who challenged the policy, Lindsay Earls, had never used drugs herself. But that did not deter Kennedy at the oral argument on March 19, 2002. Turning red, he told Ms. Earls’ attorney: “No parent would send their child to a ‘druggie’ school, except perhaps your client.” He likened a drug test to a rule requiring students to wear a school uniform. With evident sarcasm, he also remarked: “It is hardly a revelation that the government is concerned about drugs among our youth. This is not exactly rocket science.”
Perhaps there are some sacrifices of federalism doctrine the Justice is willing to make, as he may have done on Monday.
A HELPFUL COMMENT FROM PROFESSOR PAM KARLAN:
And remember also, Lyle, how Kennedy treated drugs in his concurrence in the eighth amendment proportionality case, Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U.S. 957 (1991), where he suggests drug crimes can never really be thought minor enough to get to the second and third prongs of the Solem test since drugs can cause physical, mental, or emotional changes that might make it more likely that a user would commit serious and violent crimes; that drug users might commit property crime in order to finance their purchase of drugs; and that the drug trade involves violent crime.
Kennedy’s silence
[Jed Sorokin-Altmann] There are two interesting posts in the blogosphere that discuss Justice Kennedy not writing an opinion in Raich. The first posting comes from Lyle Denniston over at SCOTUSblog, in which he muses that Justice Kennedy might just…
Comment by De Novo — June 6, 2005 @ 9:26 pm
Smoke a Raich
Jon has already posted on Raich v. Ashcroft, but I have a couple of observations.
In case you’re catching it for the first time, the Court today effectively gutted its decisions in the Lopez and Morrison cases regarding the scope of federal power …
Comment by netcynic.com — June 6, 2005 @ 10:27 pm
And remember also, Lyle, how Kennedy treated drugs in his concurrence in the eighth amendment proportionality case, Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U.S. 957 (1991), where he suggests drug crimes can never really be thought minor enough to get to the second and third prongs of the Solem test since drugs can cause physical, mental, or emotional changes that might make it more likely that a user would commit serious and violent crimes; that drug users might commit property crime in order to finance their purchase of drugs; and that the drug trade involves violent crime.
Comment by Pam Karlan — June 7, 2005 @ 11:06 am
Consistency
Justice Scalia is a Federalist: unless Federalism would mean voting against his prejudices. Justice Thomas is (at least in Ashcoft v. Raich) more consistent.
Comment by Mark A. R. Kleiman — June 8, 2005 @ 1:15 am
Kennedy’s silence
[Jed Sorokin-Altmann] There are two interesting posts in the blogosphere that discuss Justice Kennedy not writing an opinion in Raich. The first posting comes from Lyle Denniston over at SCOTUSblog, in which he muses that Justice Kennedy might just…
Comment by De Novo — June 8, 2005 @ 2:31 am
Fear And Indolence
Will Baude (subscription-required) puts together a picture of a more-convenient federalism post-Raich. The Court is probably reluctant to give the presence of state laws any weight in its constitutional analysis at all because it is difficult to establ…
Comment by thinking toward ourselves — June 9, 2005 @ 8:51 am
Justice Kennedy’s Vote in Raich:
In his National Review piece on Raich, co-blogger Randy suggests that Justice Kennedy’s vote in the case was inexplicable:
Comment by The Volokh Conspiracy — June 9, 2005 @ 11:59 am
Raich Around the Clock
Randy Barnett, who argued Raich before the Supreme Court, cites Lyle Dennison’s theory (as did I in my AmSpec column) on Justice Kennedy:Veteran Supreme Court reporter Lyle Dennison has suggested that Justice Kennedy has a zero-toelrance approach to dr…
Comment by JohnTabin.com — June 10, 2005 @ 11:13 am
Cheap Cruises
Looking for a grand cruise at an unbelievably low price? Check out our complete listing of deeply discounted cruises departing in the next 90 days.
Comment by cheap cruises — July 21, 2005 @ 6:12 pm
2005 Lincoln Navigator Review
A new engine and transmission highlight 2005 updates to Lincoln
Comment by 2005 Lincoln Navigator Review — August 3, 2005 @ 7:27 am
2005 Porsche Cayenne Review
Cayennes have all-wheel drive with low-range gearing and locking center differential.
Comment by 2005 Porsche Cayenne Review — August 5, 2005 @ 5:44 am
2005 Volkswagen Jetta Review
The Jetta
Comment by 2005 Volkswagen Jetta Review — August 7, 2005 @ 6:16 am
2005 BMW 6-Series Review
The BMW 6 Series delivers stellar performance, brilliant handling, and that arrow-like stability that marks this marque.
Comment by 2005 BMW 6-Series Review — August 9, 2005 @ 6:16 am
2005 Mercedes-Benz SLK350 Review
The SLK has a proper Mercedes-Benz feature set, from a full range of power assists and a multifunction display accessed by selector buttons on its three-spoke steering wheel to dual-zone climate control, an anti-theft system with TeleAid Stolen Vehicle…
Comment by 2005 Mercedes-Benz SLK350 Review — August 9, 2005 @ 6:17 am
2005 Pontiac Bonneville Review
All controls are canted toward the driver in true Pontiac tradition, with full instrumentation backlit in the brand-signature red lighting.
Comment by 2005 Pontiac Bonneville Review — August 10, 2005 @ 8:28 am
2005 Pontiac Montana Review
The engine used by the 2005 Pontiac Montana is a 3.4-liter V6, mated to 4-speed automatic transmission. It produces 185 horsepower and 210 lb-ft of torque.
Comment by 2005 Pontiac Montana Review — August 12, 2005 @ 10:11 am
Chrysler 300
Chrysler engineers have been reducing interior and wind noise with all their new vehicles, so it
Comment by Chrysler 300 — August 19, 2005 @ 6:02 am
Nissan Skyline
Meet the new Skyline GT350 coupe
Comment by Nissan Skyline — August 26, 2005 @ 6:28 pm
ford bronco
It
Comment by ford bronco — August 31, 2005 @ 3:23 am
Honda Prelude
Again front-wheel drive with a 4-cylinder engine, Prelude rode a 1.4-inch longer wheelbase than before, and measured 3.2 inches longer overall.
Comment by Honda Prelude — August 31, 2005 @ 5:24 am
Pontiac GTO
Unlike its predecessors, though, the new GTO knows what to do when there
Comment by Pontiac GTO — September 2, 2005 @ 3:42 am
Justice Kennedy: Supreme Swinger
Once Alito’s confirmed, the Court will have a solid 4-4 split. Given our imperial court system, that means the lone swinger, Kennedy, is going to be one powerful hepcat. So, let’s take a look at the man. It seems to me, as a Russian optimist might say…
Comment by Le Sabot Post-Moderne — November 17, 2005 @ 12:25 am